Caring Behavior of Nurses in Orthopedic Wards of Selected Health Institutions As Perceived by Patients

Submitted by Dr. F.O. Adeyemo

Tags: caring Caring Behaviors caring in nursing comfort orthopedic Patients Orthopedic Wards Perception

Caring Behavior of Nurses in Orthopedic Wards of Selected Health Institutions As Perceived by Patients

Share Article:

Florence. O. Adeyemo
Dept. of Nursing, College of Health Sciences,
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology,
Ogbomoso.

Oladeji Oloyede Michael
Dept. Of Nursing, College Of Health Sciences.
Osogbo

Layi Okunlade
Dept. Of Nursing,
College Of Health Sciences
Osogbo

Abstract

Nurses are trained to provide hands-on care to patients in a variety of settings, which includes physical which can range from total care to helping a patient prevent illness. The health of a patient can significantly improve when they (patients) perceive caring nursing behaviours and are satisfied with the quality of care been received from their care giver.

The aim of this study was to determine the caring behaviour of nurses as perceived by patients admitted to orthopaedic ward in some selected hospitals in Osogbo, Osun state, Nigeria.

A descriptive comparative design was used. Convenient sample technique was used to select 616 respondents consisting of male and female patients admitted to Orthopaedic wards. The questionnaire on Caring Behaviour Assessment scale adapted from CBI. The most highly ranked perceived nurses’ behaviour by patients is ‘satisfactory’ which includes the general perception of the patients and rendering of basic needs. The findings also revealed that patients rated Nurses behaviour (care-giving) with respect to human needs assistance, the provision of safe environment, assisting in psychological care and giving physical comfort as average. Lastly, findings also revealed that patients rated perceived Nurses behaviour (care-giving) as ‘not satisfactory’ with regards to meeting their communication needs, nutritional needs and individualized care.

In conclusion, care giving is an important branch of nursing and it depicts the quality of care been received by a patient which in turn is capable of aiding speedy recovery.

Introduction

Nursing have always been synonymous with the concept of care and caring (Wilfred et al., 2012). Majority of individuals choose nursing as a profession because of their desire to care for other individuals. Caring is a science which encompasses a humanitarian, human science orientation, human caring processes. It can simply be defined as the act giving someone attention of providing treatment (Wilfred et al., 2012). Caring behaviours are defined as; Behaviours evidenced by nurses in caring for patients (Cronin and Harrison, 1988). The top ten caring behaviours, derived from nursing literature are; attentive listening, comforting, honesty, patience, responsibility, providing information so the patient can make an informed decision, touch, sensitivity, respect, calling the patient by name (Watson, 2003).

Patients that receive good care or support during illness are more likely to trust nursing staff and cope better with their anxieties and grief. Vance (2011) described caring as a concept which has led to the development of theories such as Leininger’s theory of cultural care and Jean Watson’s theory of human caring. Jean Watson defined caring as a science that encompasses a humanitarian, human science orientation, human caring processes, phenomena and experiences whose goal centred on helping the patient gain higher degree of harmony within the mind, body and soul (Watson, 1997). Madeleine Leininger (1991) explained that care is the essence of nursing and the central dominant and unifying focus of nursing. Clukey (2004) stated that Nurses show a caring behaviour through the tone of voice and words they say.  Most patients judge the quality of care by the support and communication they receive from nurses. Patient will remember nurses by the behaviours the nurses demonstrated during illness. Clukey (2004) further stated that caring takes time i.e., you must be present and fully engaged, not acting in a hurry and you must know your patient as individuals. Clukey (2004) in Vance (2011) opined that giving physical comfort is also important. Caring include being attentive, anticipating patients needs and providing assistance for the patients and family. The caring behaviours evidenced by nurses in caring for patients include attentive listening, comforting, honesty, patience, responsibility, providing information so that the patient can make an informed decision, touch, sensitivity, respect, calling patient by name. Mrs Shofunlayo, a mother of quintuplets, in the Nation’s newspaper (2011) narrated the caring attitude of nurses in the Lagos University Teaching Hospital as not weary of assisting and kind to her.

Majority of the accident victims that comes into the hospital ends up in orthopaedic wards (Veitch et al, (2005). This fact signifies the need for improved health care for patients in the orthopaedic wards. Nurses are at the forefront of caring for all patients, and most of these patients present complex challenges for health care professionals (Huston, 2003). It is  important  nurses adapt to the challenges and care of orthopaedic patients because they stay in bed for a long period and hence nurses are in more regular and prolonged contact with orthopaedic than is the case in other working environments.  Inadequate care will not only affect the patient, but it has the capacity to adversely affect the nursing profession. Oskouie et. al (2004) stated that nurses particularly in critical care environ­ments, are often the most vulnerable to stress and in need of much sup­port. They further discussed that lack of motivation at work, and a desire to leave the critical care environment as soon as possible as a major determinant of caring behaviour of nurses. Caring behaviours are identifined as behaviours evidenced by nurses in caring for patients. This study tend to reveal the caring behaviour of nurses as perceived by patients admitted to orthopaedic wards of some selected  hospitals in Osogbo, Osun state .

Statement of Problem

Nursing education in Nigeria has been reviewed in the decades of 1990s to propel nurses into the age of client care. Nursing care for hospitalized adults entails primarily curative and restorative health and it is expected that approaches to the delivery of care including attitude of nurses has changed positively. However, what is perceived by the society as the caring behaviour of nurses remains questionable. Hence, this study will reveal the caring behaviour of nurses as perceived by patients admitted to orthopaedic ward in some selected hospitals in Osogbo, Osun state.

Objective

To identify Nurses perceived behaviour as caring by patients during Hospitalization

Significance of study

The role of nurses has been revolutionized, in addition to providing direct care for individuals, it is expected that nurses should assume other roles such as health appraisals, advocates, teachers and counsellors. The total effectiveness of nursing care giving to hospitalized patients need to be researched upon because the voice of society who is increasingly knowledgeable and sophisticated regarding their expectation of  health care will continue to demand high quality  services rendered by nurses. This study will identify nurses behaviours perceived as caring and will help nurses working in the orthopaedic ward where time are spent with patient to improve  their relationships with their patients. It will also assist nurses to be aware of assessment of their caring activities and demonstration of professional competence as viewed by patients, which are significant expressions of caring.

Methodology

Design: Descriptive research design was employed with the aid of a structured questionnaire.

Settings: Selected health institutions in Osun state, Nigeria (Lautech teaching hospital, State hospital, Ashubiaro and Jelayemi mission hospital, Osogbo)

Participants: A convenient sample consisting of male and female patients admitted to Orthopaedic wards.

Instruments: Patients’ perceptive of caring behaviours used by nurses were measured via the Caring Behaviour Assessment adapted from CBI (Caring Behaviours Scale). The instrument  consist of two sections, section A is the demographic data, while section B consists of  lists with 65 nursing behaviours in eleven subscales and is congruent with Milliken and Campel (1985) caring factors. Patients were asked to rate behaviours of their nurses. It is a self-developed structured closed ended questionnaire. The questionnaire was first prepared in English and then translated into the Yoruba language.

Questionnaire was pilot-tested in areas other than the study areas, and the necessary revisions were made. The questionnaire was guided by review of literature for consistency and construct validity. The reliability test was carried out using test re-test method using Pearson Product Moment Correlation coefficient and this yielded 0.86. After completing the questionnaires, the answered questions on nursing behaviours were scored.   

Data collection: Ten research assistant were recruited for data collection. Participants who gave their consents to participate in the study received elaborated explanation on the purpose of the study, the type of questions, how to answer by trained facilitators. Furthermore, to ensure privacy and enhance honest and frank responses, male and female were treated separately.

Data analysis and interpreta­tion: PASW 18 was used for data analysis.

Ethical Consideration: Approval was sought from the ethics committee of Ministry of Health, Lautech Teaching hospital and Jolayemi hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria. Further permission and written con­sent was obtained from all participants in this study. Anonymity of the participants was maintained throughout the study.

Results

Hypothesis one

There was no significant difference between the perception of patients towards ‘nurses meeting their self-esteem needs and patients’ satisfaction’. The independent variables in this hypothesis are patients’ perception and it was categorised into two (negative and positive). Those who score below the mean were categorised as having negative perception while those with a score above the mean were categorised as having positive perception. The dependent variable is patients satisfaction. Independent t-test statistic was employed to test this hypothesis at .05 level of significance and reported in table 1

Table 1

Independent t-test of patients perception towards nurses and patients satisfaction          

Grouping variables

N

M

SD

Df

t-test

Sig.

Negative attitude

280

17.60

1.07

614

25.022

.000

Positive attitude

336

21.11

1.36

 

 

 

*significant at P < .05; critical t-value = 0.196; df = 614.

Independent t-test analysis was employed to investigate the difference between patients perception and patients satisfaction. As presented in Table 1 the calculated t-value of 25.022 is greater than the critical t-value of 0.196 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that, the null hypothesis which states that, there is no significant difference between the perception of patients towards nurses meeting their self-esteem needs and patients satisfaction is rejected while the alternate hypothesis is upheld. A cursory look at the mean values of the two groups when compared revealed that patients with positive perception are more and have a higher mean value (N = 336; M = 21.11; SD = 1.36) than patients with negative perception toward nurses (N = 280; M = 17.60; SD = 1.36) with the mean difference (MD = 2.51). It therefore means that, there is statistical significant mean difference between patients with positive and negative perception towards nurses, thus affecting their satisfaction.

Hypothesis two

There is no significant relationship between ‘patients perception towards nurses meeting their communication needs and patients satisfaction’. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 2.

Table 2

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception towards nurses meeting their communication needs and patients satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Communication needs

616

31.05

3.07

 

0.298

 

.000

Patients satisfaction

 

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

*significant at P < .05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients perception of nurses meeting their communication needs and patients satisfaction. As presented in Table 2 the calculated r-value of 0.298 is greater than the critical r-value of 0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis which states that, there is no significant relationship between patients perception towards nurses meeting their communication needs and patients satisfaction is rejected. It therefore means that, there is statistical significant relationship between patients perception towards nurses meeting their communication needs and patients satisfaction.

Hypothesis three

There is no significant relationship between patients perception towards nurses meeting their ‘human needs assistance and patients satisfaction’. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 3.

Table 3

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception towards nurses meeting their human needs assistance and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Human needs assistance

616

6.62

1.00

 

0.371

 

.000

Patients satisfaction

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

*significant at P < .05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients ‘perception of nurses meeting their human needs/assistance and patients satisfaction’. As presented in Table 3 the calculated r-value of 0.371 is greater than the critical r-value of 0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis which states that, there is no significant relationship between patients perception towards nurses meeting their human needs/assistance and patients satisfaction is rejected. It therefore means that averagely patients perceive nurses to have met their human needs assistance showing that patients gain satisfaction. 

Hypothesis four 

There is no significant relationship between patients’ perception of nurses taking time and patients satisfaction. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 4

Table 4

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception of nurses taking time and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Nurses taking time

616

21.92

4.12

 

0.059

 

.143

Patients satisfaction

 

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

not significant at P >.05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients’ perception of nurses taking time and patients’ satisfaction. As presented in Table 4 the calculated r-value of 0.059 is less than the critical r-value of 0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis is retained. It therefore means that, patients perceive nurses not to have time for them therefore living them unsatisfactied.

Hypothesis five 

There is no significant relationship between patients’ perception of nurses giving basic needs and patients satisfaction. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 5

Table 5

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception of nurses giving basic needs and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Nurses giving basic needs

616

6.62

1.00

 

0.371

 

.000

Patients satisfaction

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

*significant at P >.05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients’ perception of nurses giving basic needs and patients’ satisfaction. As presented in Table 5 the calculated r-value of 0.371 is greater than the critical r-value of  0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis is rejected. It therefore means that, patients perceive nurses to be very effective in rendering basic needs therefore giving them satisfaction.

Hypothesis six 

There is no significant relationship between patients’ perception of nurses toward provision of safe environment and patients satisfaction. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 6.

Table 6

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception of nurses towards provision of safe environment and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Nurses providing safe environment

616

12.67

1.83

 

0.178

 

.000

Patients satisfaction

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

*significant at P >.05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients’ perception of nurses providing safe environment and patients’ satisfaction. As presented in Table 6 the calculated r-value of 0.178 is greater than the critical r-value of 0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis is rejected. It therefore means that, though very low, patients perceive nurses positively in the provision of safe environment therefore giving the patients satisfaction.

Hypothesis seven

There is no significant relationship between patients’ perception of nurses assisting with nutritional needs and patients satisfaction. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 7.

Table 7

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception of nurses towards assisting with nutritional needs and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Nutritional needs

616

9.03

1.72

 

0.017

 

.674

Patients satisfaction

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

not significant at P >.05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients’ perception of nurses assisting with nutritional needs and patients’ satisfaction. As presented in Table 7 the calculated r-value of 0.017 is less than the critical r-value of 0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis is retained. It therefore means that, though patients perceive nurses negatively in assisting with nutritional needs, it also affect their level of satisfaction.

Hypothesis eight 

There is no significant relationship between patients’ perception of nurses assisting in individualized care and patients satisfaction. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 8.

Table 8

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception of nurses towards assisting in individualized care and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Nurses assisting in individualized care

616

12.70

1.53

 

0.074

 

.068

Patients satisfaction

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

Not significant at P >.05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients’ perception of nurses assisting in individualized care and patients’ satisfaction. As presented in Table 8 the calculated r-value of 0.074 is less than the critical r-value of 0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis is retained. It therefore means that, though patients perceive nurses negatively in assisting in individualized care, it also affects their level of satisfaction.

Hypothesis nine  

There is no significant relationship between patients’ perception of nurses assisting in psychological support and patients satisfaction. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 9.

Table 9

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception of nurses assisting in psychological care and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Nurses assisting in individualized care

616

30.05

3.06

 

0.367

 

.000

Patients satisfaction

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

Significant at P >.05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients’ perception of nurses assisting in psychological care and patients’ satisfaction. As presented in Table 9, the calculated r-value of 0.367 was greater than the critical r-value of 0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis is rejected. It therefore means that, patients’ perceive nurses moderately positively in assisting in psychological care and this affect their level of satisfaction.

Hypothesis ten  

There is no significant relationship between patients’ perception of nurses providing therapeutic milieu and patients’ satisfaction. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 10.

Table 10

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception of nurses towards providing therapeutic milieu and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Providing therapeutic milieu

616

22.45

2.88

 

0.021

 

.609

Patients satisfaction

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

not significant at P >.05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients’ perception of nurses providing therapeutic milieu  and patients’ satisfaction. As presented in Table 10 the calculated r-value of 0.021 is less than the critical r-value of  0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis is retained. It therefore means that, though patients perceive nurses negatively in providing therapeutic milieu, it also affect their level of satisfaction.

Hypothesis eleven   

There is no significant relationship between patients’ perception of nurses giving physical comfort to patients and patients’ satisfaction. Pearson product moment correlation was employed at .05 level of significance and reported in table 11.

Table 11

Pearson product moment correlation of patients’ perception of nurses giving physical comfort to patients and patients’ satisfaction

Variables

N

Mean

SD

r-value

Sig.

Giving physical comfort to patients

616

14.89

2.05

 

1.36

 

.001

Patients satisfaction

616

18.97

1.76

 

 

Significant at P >.05; critical r-value = 0.138; df = 614.

Pearson product moment correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between patients’ perception of nurses giving physical comfort to patients and patients’ satisfaction. As presented in Table 11 the calculated r-value of 1.36 is greater than the critical r-value of 0.138 with 614 degree of freedom, this result therefore implies that the null hypothesis is rejected. It therefore means that, patients’ have positive but low perception toward nurses towards giving physical comfort to patients and this affect their level of satisfaction.

Discussion

The results of this study provide some concrete information on nurses behaviour (care) patient experience in the orthopaedic units of selected hospitals. Total no of six hundred and sixteen (616) respondents consisting of male and female patients admitted to Orthopaedic wards from Lautech teaching hospital, State hospital Ashubiaro and Jelayemi mission hospital, Osogbo participated in this study. Patients complete the Caring Behavior Assessment scale and rated behaviours of their nurses under eleven subscales of caring factors. Our study revealed patients ratings were in three different categories (i.e effective and thus gaining satisfaction, average and those perceived as not satisfactory).

Our study revealed that the most high ranked perceived nurses behaviour by patients as satisfactory include the general perception of the patients and rendering of basic needs. This study supports the findings of Kimble (2003) that revealed Human Needs Assistance as the most important subscale.

Another result of our findings that revealed that perceived nurses behaviour by patients is averagely satisfactory as regards human needs/assistance, the provision of safe environment, assisting in psychological care and giving physical comfort. This result does not correlate with the findings of Ferdous et. al (2013) where patients in critical care units perceived physical and technical behaviours as most important caring behaviours.  

Further findings revealed that patients perceive nurses behaviour as not satisfactory as regards meeting their communication needs, creating time for them, assisting with nutritional needs and assisting in individualized care. This isn’t in tune with the findings of Kimble (2003) in which “Answer my questions clearly” was listed as the subsequent order of importance the caring behaviors perceived by the patient.

Conclusion

Caring is viewed as the central focus of nursing and it is fundamental in clinical practice. This research shows that nurses struggle to provide quality care as shown by the patients’ perception of caring which in turn affects many areas of patient’s satisfaction.

Recommendations

It is important for nurses to be knowledgeable about the caring behaviours as perceived by patients.

There is need for well-trained and clinically competent nurses to meet the caring needs of patients so as to improve the caring behaviour in nursing practice.

References

  1. Wilfred, M., Robert, M., Watson, R. (2012). Care in Nursing: Principles, values and skills. Oxford University Press Inc, United states.
  2. Cronin, S.N., Harrison, B. (1988). Importance of nurse caring behaviors as perceived by patients after myocardial infarction. PubMed. 17(4), 374-380.
  3. Watson, J. (2003). Jean Watson and the theory of human caring. Theory overview. Available from: http://ww2.uchsc.edu/son/caring/content/wct.asp.
  4. Vance, T. (2011). Caring and the Professional Practice of Nursing. RN Journal. 1-19. Available from: http://docslide.us/documents/caring-and-the-professional-practice-of-nursingdocx.html
  5. Watson, J. (1997). The theory of human caring: Retrospective and prospective. Nursing Science Quarterly. 10(1), 49-52.
  6. Leininger, M. M. (1991). Culture care Diversity and Universality: A Theory of Nursing. National  League of Nursing Press, New York. P 35.
  7. Clukey, L. (2004). Importance for Developing Nurse Caring Behaviors for Family. 1-22. Available from: http://www.stti.iupui.edu/pp07/vancouver09/40513.Clukey,%20Lory-C%2004.pdf
  8. Lucky Mum. (2011). The Nation’s News paper. Vintage Press Limited, Lagos. Pg 1-2.
  9. Veitch, C., Sheehan, M., Turner, R., Siskind, V., Pashen, D. (2005). The economic, medical and social costs of road traffic crashes in rural North Queensland: A 5-year multi-phase study. 8th National Rural Health Conference. 2005 March 24; Alice Springs. Northern Territory.
  10. Huston, C., (2013). The Impact of Emerging Technology on Nursing Care: Warp Speed Ahead. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 18( 2).
  11. Oskouie, F., Rafii, F., Nikravesh., M. (2004). Factors involved in nurses' responses to burnout: a grounded nurses theory study. BMC nursing, 3(1), 6-12.
  12. Kimble, L. (2003). "Patients’ Perceptions of Nurse Caring Behaviors in an Emergency Department". Theses, Dissertations and Capstones.Paper 261. Marshall University.
  13. Milliken, M. Amd Campbelle, G. (1985). Workbook to accompany essential competencies for patient care. Coas Books Inc., NM, USA.
  14. Ferdous, H., Raeda, A., and Ibrahim, R.A. (2013). Perceptions of patients towards nurse caring behaviors in coronary care units in Jordan. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(21), 3183–3191.